![]() |
Election process in dormitory to choose new head of dormitory committee |
When we hear a word “election”,
what’s on our mind? A democratic party whis is held by our country once every
five years to choose our next governor? Yes, that is not wrong and that is what
mostly people think about election. But, since I became the students of SMAN 10
Malang and lived in dormitory, this paradigm has been changed.
Three weeks ago, there were an
election to choose the head of dormitory committee in my dormitory. That was
held by captain of 9 houses and it was commanded by Mr. Muslich, our Head of
Dormitory. The election process was very interesting. The process and the rules
of this election were made as good as the rules of the national election for
choosing our new governors. There were an interview test, opened campaign, and
public debate. They also made a rule said that the one who will become the new
head of dormitory committee have to get at least 125 votes of the students.
And after all of those election
process has been done, the students were free to choose their new leader in
dormitory. I was there –of course– and I became the witness so I saw the counting
process. First candidate, Nando and Mini got 113 votes while Tedy and Bahrul
got 101 votes. The rest chose Pandu and Nizam. Suddenly, the committee made an
unilateral decision. They decided that Nando and Mini became the new head and
vice head of dormitory committee although they get less than 125 votes, as the
rule said before. Some of my friends said, “ It’s ok. I know that the committee
were very tired to made this election. So they don’t need to make the second
round election. “ While my other friends said “ It’s not fair. They break their
own rule and it makes me dissappointed! ”.
So, what do you think about this
kind of case, when the election process doesn’t ran as the rule said? Should we
call it as an unfair election while the principle of election in Indonesia
which are LUBER JURDIL has been applied there? As we know, fair in this case
means all people reserve the right to vote and to be voted if they are suit
with the criterias. In my opinion, the election process in dormitory has
applied it, so we can call it as a fair election. When we talk about the violated
rules, I think it is just about the mechanism of the elction process and it is
not a big problem as long as the candidates has been agree with that decision.
So, essentially, the elction process around me has been fair and it has applied
the principle of election. Oh ya, by the way, congratulations Nando and Mini!
Good luck for making this dormitory better! J